Note that if there are small pockets in crystals where both parent and daughter product can accumulate from the lava, then one can inherit correlated ages from the lava into minerals. Many dating methods seem to give about the same ages on meteorites. In fact, it probably rises to the top of the magma, artificially increasing its concentration there. Every one of the the basalt layers contained pillow basalts. Now lets use this information to help suggest a solution to a problem with the Columbia River Basalt in Washington State.Next
These are considered by most Creationists to have been laid down during the time of the flood. There is no question about it. In addition, the rapid cooling and the process of formation means that these beads would have Rb, Sr, U, and Pb concentrations the same as the lava they came from, since there is no chance for crystals to form with such rapid cooling. If we know when a lava flow was made because it happened recently, and we then check to see how much Argon is in the rock; That measurement will tell us how well the Argon actually came out of the rock. In the studies we have been performing in two Azorean islands, when we compare our ages obtained with the analysis of fresh groundmass analysis with the previously published K-Ar ages analysis of whole-rock samples , we concluded that the presence of phenocrysts in the whole rock samples influenciated the ages obtained.Next
While Potassium minerals do not give young dates, they are much younger than what is expected in main stream science. This is how science normally works. A deficiency of 40 Ar in a sample of a known age can indicate a full or partial melt in the thermal history of the area. Some of these are taken from John Woodmoreappe's article on the subject, but only when I have reason to believe the statements are also generally believed. First, many igneous formations span many periods, and so have little constraint on what period they could belong to. Lava that cools underground cools much more slowly, and can form large crystals. So if there are multiple heatings of the rock, the K-Ar dating process may give the researcher a number that is not what the researcher expects to find.
On the otherhand, some phenocrysts may have crystallized after the eruption of the magma. So the argument that excess argon produces erroneous apparent ages is still correct. However, the 40K isotope is radioactive and therefore will be reduced in quantity over time. This lava will take longer to cool down, giving more opportunity for enclosed argon to escape and leading to younger radiometric ages. Significant quantities of argon may be introduced into a mineral even at pressures as low as one bar. Within the magna chamber of a volcano, the molten lava gets mixed together much like the lentil soup in my cooking pot.Next
Still another evidence for problems with radiometric dating was given in a recent talk I attended by a man who had been an evolutionist and taken a course in radiometric dating. By measuring the amount of carbon-14 and comparing that amount to the original, scientists can obtain a date for the death of the organism. The original element is called the parent, and the result of the decay process is called the daughter element. Whatever is making some of these dates inaccurate could be making all of them inaccurate. Another time, I might use a lot of sweet basil.
This problem would especially be real if the reseting rock is in some lower layer, below the surface of the ground, or even under water. What aspects should I consider about? However, 40Ar is the decay product of 40K and therefore will increase in quantity over time. What is meant by filtered data, is that they only present the data that agrees with evolutionary thinking. Why pursue a matter that will only waste time and money? In rubidium-strontium dating, micas exclude strontium when they form, but accept much rubidium. How do they know the decay rate has been the same for millions or billions of years? Thus the agreement found between many dates does not necessarily reflect an agreement between different methods, but rather the agreement of the K-Ar method with itself. I'm amazed at the extraordinary faith so many evolutionists have to trust in the assumptions of a few men running around claiming they know the age of the earth based on the scientific method -- this is a joke, and a slap in the face, to those who do real scientific research.Next
Furthermore, the same method can produce different ages on different parts of the same rock. The top of the columbia river basalts is dated to be 6 million years. The details are best pursued in a dedicated text like McDougall and Harrison. The point I was making in citing the two articles using Argon gas pressure in both mica and muscovite was to suggest that when the rock heated up, the Argon gas will follow its concentration gradient. For some evidence for a young sun, see. In the North East portion of Yellowstone National Park is found one of the best petrified fossil forests in the world. What is the answer to these problems? Such a phenomenon would great affect the shape of the age spectrum.
Water mixed with volcanic material and anything else like trees, mud, and big boulders. For every 100 K-40 atoms that decay, 11 become Ar-40. The results from a laser probe can be plotted in several graphical ways, including a map of a grain showing lateral argon distribution. However, there is always the tendency in scientists to believe it so. When various scientists first started looking at the fossil trees they determined that it shows a succession of forests separated by volcanic flows. This gives us the impression that all but a small percentage of the dates computed by radiometric methods agree with the assumed ages of the rocks in which they are found, and that all of these various methods almost always give ages that agree with each other to within a few percentage points.Next